Insights

The Effectiveness of the Table

One ready criticism of the table is that compared to the platform it’s highly inefficient, or so it seems.

In our post on Leading around the Table, we suggested that leaders often underestimate the power of the table and overestimate the power of the platform as places of influence and transformation. One ready criticism of the table is that compared to the platform it’s highly inefficient or so it seems.

We would tend to disagree, but even if it was true we’d suggest the platform is as ineffective as the table is inefficient. Those who question the efficiency of the table do so on the basis of capacity and time. The table reaches too few and takes too long. Let’s do the maths…

For the sake of argument let’s say the table seats 12,the auditorium seats 1,200. It would take 100 tables to accommodate the same number of people at the same time or 100 sittings if you only had one table! No brainer. Platform wins! But if we start with a table of 12 and every three months half the people around the table after three months start hosting their own table of 12 and so on. Within one year there are 2,323 people sitting around tables while the 1,200 seater auditorium is still hosting 1,200 people because there’s no room to fit any more in. Table wins!

It turns out the table is far more scalable than the platform and  we'd suggest scalability is more important that efficiency. Putting it another way scalability is efficiency in the future tense.

Efficiency addresses the question: How well are we utilising our resources - energy, time and money - in pursuit of achieving our goals? Effectiveness asks the question: How well are we doing in achieving goals? Wisdom asks the question: Are our goals the right goals?!  I’d suggest the table is only inefficient if the goal is to divide the room rather than to extend the vision, culture or message.

What if the table is not about dividing the number of people currently in the auditorium being informed? What if it’s about multiplying the number of people inside and outside of the auditorium being transformed?

The key metric being not the number of people on the receiving end of an explanation but the number of people on the participatory end of an experience. In determining the efficiency and effectiveness of the table, and the platform for that matter, we need to be clear on the purpose and goals of each.

More Insights
Any human service that requires love cannot be satisfactorily dispensed by specialist institutions that exist apart from community.
True wisdom also contains hallmarks of excellence, creativity and beauty as well as the idea of enriching knowledge and understanding with experience.
It occurs to me that authentic leaders not only embrace their life story, they tell it and in the process invite those they lead to participate in that narrative.
Dreaming is so important because it has the potential to shape our thoughts, plans and actions.